Crop Protection

Corn Rootworm: Global Solutions from Leading AgTech Innovators

Discover global companies providing innovative solutions against corn rootworm. Explore biologicals, seed traits, monitoring tools, and more.
Photo by Waldemar on Unsplash

Key Takeaways

  • Corn rootworm (CRW) is one of the most destructive pests in global corn production, with significant yield and economic impacts, particularly in the U.S., Europe, and South America.
  • Resistance to Bt traits, crop rotation, and insecticides is increasing, making traditional control methods less effective and highlighting the need for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies.
  • Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches—combining biological, cultural, genetic, and chemical tools—are essential for sustainable, long-term CRW control.
  • Monitoring programs and early detection tools are becoming more widely adopted, helping growers respond to pest pressure in real time and reduce overuse of costly treatments.
  • The iGrow News Directory connects farmers, agronomists, and industry professionals with companies offering CRW solutions, including biological products, seed traits, and advanced monitoring systems.

Overview: The Corn Rootworm Threat and Global Economic Impact

Corn rootworm (CRW) remains one of the most economically significant pests affecting corn production globally. Known as the “billion-dollar bug” in the U.S., CRW includes several species—primarily the western and northern corn rootworms—that cause extensive root damage, leading to lodging, stunted growth, and major yield losses. Its adaptability and growing resistance to Bt traits, insecticides, and even crop rotation have made it a persistent challenge for growers in major production regions.

In the United States, CRW is responsible for more yield loss and insect-related expenditure than any other corn pest, with damages and control costs estimated at over $1 billion annually. In Europe, particularly in Central and Eastern countries, western corn rootworm has steadily expanded its range since the 1990s, prompting strict monitoring and containment strategies. South America, while less affected historically, is now seeing localized outbreaks, raising concerns as corn cultivation expands and pest pressures evolve.


What is Corn Rootworm?

Corn rootworm encompasses several closely related beetle species within the Diabrotica genus. Among the most destructive pests of corn in North America, the key species include the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera), northern corn rootworm (Diabrotica barberi), and southern corn rootworm (Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi, also known as the spotted cucumber beetle).

Identification and Life Cycle

These pests belong to the leaf beetle family (Chrysomelidae). The larvae are creamy white, slender, and grow up to ½ inch long. They feature a dark brown head and a distinct plate at the tail end, which gives them a “double-headed” appearance. Larvae feed aggressively on corn roots, impairing plant stability and nutrient uptake. Adults differ in appearance depending on the species: the western variant is yellow with three black stripes, the northern is uniformly light green, and the southern is yellow to light green with 12 black wing spots.

Seasonal Activity

The life cycle of corn rootworm begins when eggs are deposited in the soil during late summer. These eggs overwinter and hatch in late spring or early summer. The larvae then go through three instars before pupating and emerging as adults later in the season. Understanding this timing is critical for timely intervention.


Why It Matters: Economic and Agronomic Impact of Corn Rootworm

Yield Losses and Agricultural Impact

Corn rootworm is considered the most damaging invertebrate pest in U.S. corn production. In 2023, the pest was responsible for the greatest share of a 5.2% estimated yield loss across 27 states, equivalent to over 837 million bushels lost nationwide. Despite a slight improvement in 2024, invertebrate pests still caused a 4.0% yield reduction across 29 states, with corn rootworm remaining the primary contributor to the damage. In the most severely infested fields, larval feeding can result in yield losses of up to 50%, due to impaired root function and plant lodging.

Economic Costs and Treatment Expenses

Managing corn rootworm constitutes the largest insect-related expenditure for U.S. corn producers. Chemical control options, such as soil insecticides and seed-applied treatments, cost around $15 or more per acre. Many growers also use genetically engineered Bt corn hybrids to combat rootworm larvae, though these traits come at a premium and require strict adherence to refuge strategies to delay resistance.

Resistance Challenges and Management

Corn rootworm has developed resistance to several control methods. Resistance to Bt traits—starting with Cry3Bb1—has been confirmed in parts of Iowa, Illinois, and Nebraska. Low-level resistance to soil insecticides, including pyrethroids and organophosphates, has also been observed. Key factors accelerating this resistance include continuous corn planting, poor dispersal of adult beetles, and non-recessive inheritance of resistance genes.

Strategic Response and Long-Term Outlook

To address growing resistance, the EPA has implemented new regulations such as mandatory refuges and usage restrictions in high-risk zones. Experts stress the importance of rotating crops, pyramiding Bt traits, integrating soil insecticides strategically, and using monitoring tools as part of an IPM approach. Without these practices, overreliance on single-tactic strategies can reduce both profitability and pest control effectiveness in the long run.


Categories of Solutions Against Corn Rootworm

Disclaimer:
The companies and products mentioned in this article are included because they (1) are listed in the iGrow News Directory and/or (2) have shared news or updates with us within the past 12 months. Their inclusion does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by iGrow News. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and due diligence before selecting any product or service for corn rootworm management.

If your company offers solutions relevant to this topic and would like to be featured in future coverage, you can add your organization to the iGrow News Directory by selecting any of our available plans—from Startup to Established.

Company Product Type
AMVAC BioWake Prime™ Biological Insecticide
Albaugh BIOST® Nematicide 100 Biological Seed Treatment
Bayer Crop Science The Watch Program Monitoring System
SmartStax® PRO Traditional (Bt + RNAi Trait)
VT4PRO™ Traditional (Bt + RNAi Trait)
SmartStax® RIB Complete® Traditional (Bt Trait)
Corteva Agriscience Vorceed™ Enlist® Traditional (Bt + RNAi Trait)
Brevant® Vorceed® Enlist® Traditional (Bt + RNAi Trait)
Pioneer® Qrome®, Optimum® AcreMax® XTreme Traditional (Bt Trait)
NewLeaf Symbiotics TS201 Biological Insecticide
Syngenta Durastak™ Traditional (Bt Trait)
DurastakViptera™ Traditional (Bt Trait)
Agrisure Duracade® Traditional (Bt Trait)
Pattern Ag / EarthOptics Program with Stine Seed to predict & mitigate future risks associated with corn rootworm infestations. Monitoring System

Final Thoughts

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plays a central role in the sustainable management of corn rootworm (CRW), one of the most economically damaging pests in U.S. corn production. Given the pest’s adaptability and history of developing resistance to control strategies—including Bt traits, crop rotation, and conventional insecticides—IPM provides a balanced approach by integrating multiple tools to manage populations effectively. Rather than relying on a single tactic, which can quickly lead to resistance, IPM deploys a combination of cultural practices, biological controls, genetic traits, and chemical interventions based on real-time field data and pest thresholds.

Key IPM components for managing corn rootworm include crop rotation, which disrupts the pest’s life cycle, though it is becoming less effective as some CRW populations adapt to rotating crops. Scouting and monitoring are also essential, allowing growers to determine the timing and necessity of interventions. Genetic solutions like Bt and RNAi hybrids are rotated to reduce resistance pressure, while biological controls—such as beneficial nematodes and cover crops—enhance natural pest suppression. Chemical insecticides, when used, are applied judiciously and rotated to avoid resistance buildup. Importantly, IPM emphasizes economic thresholds, ensuring that treatments are only used when pest pressure threatens yield, which preserves tool efficacy and minimizes costs.

Research consistently supports that combining tactics within an IPM framework delivers better long-term outcomes than singular approaches. For instance, while stacking insecticides with Bt traits can improve short-term yield performance, it does little to slow resistance and may increase selection pressure. Conversely, IPM strategies aim to extend the utility of available technologies, protect environmental resources, and improve overall farm profitability by adapting interventions to specific field conditions. With corn rootworm’s demonstrated resilience, integrated strategies remain the only viable path toward sustained, effective control.

As of 2025, corn rootworm (CRW) management in the U.S. is facing renewed challenges as resistance to Bt traits continues to spread. Field-confirmed resistance to all major Bt proteins—including Cry3, Cry34/35, and mCry3A—is now common in both western and northern CRW populations, particularly in areas with continuous corn. While pyramided hybrids still reduce injury, their effectiveness is showing signs of erosion. The introduction of RNA interference (RNAi) traits such as VT4PRO, SmartStax PRO, and Durastak has added new modes of action, but the pest’s adaptability raises concerns about long-term durability. Crop rotation remains a core strategy, yet rotation-resistant western CRW variants and northern CRW with extended diapause are appearing in new areas, complicating management plans.

Economic and environmental pressures are also shaping current CRW management. Overuse of Bt hybrids in low-pressure zones has been linked to reduced profitability, prompting calls for more targeted deployment. Meanwhile, pyrethroid resistance limits chemical options, and although neonicotinoid seed treatments offer partial protection, their benefit is largely limited to non-Bt corn. These trends underscore the increasing importance of proactive monitoring programs and integrated pest management (IPM). Initiatives by Bayer and university extension networks are expanding the use of sticky trap networks and data-driven scouting tools to detect population shifts early. As CRW pressure intensifies in previously low-risk areas, driven in part by changing weather patterns and pest adaptation, growers are encouraged to remain flexible and incorporate diverse, region-specific tactics to ensure long-term control.

Visit our AgTech Directory to discover and connect with companies offering corn rootworm solutions worldwide.

administrator
As a dedicated journalist and entrepreneur, I helm iGrow News, a pioneering media platform focused on the evolving landscape of Agriculture Technology. With a deep-seated passion for uncovering the latest developments and trends within the agtech sector, my mission is to deliver insightful, unbiased news and analysis. Through iGrow News, I aim to empower industry professionals, enthusiasts, and the broader public with knowledge and understanding of technological advancements that shape modern agriculture. You can follow me on LinkedIn & Twitter.

Leave a Reply